Investing.com vs IIFL: which broker is better
Investing.com replies to 100% of unhappy reviews on Google Play, IIFL to 83%. IIFL does not read your contacts; Investing.com does. Over the last 90 days of reviews, Investing.com averages 4.03 and IIFL 3.50. The most serious complaint about Investing.com is "none found"; about IIFL, "Nobody answers".
| Investing.com | IIFL | |
|---|---|---|
| Most serious thing people report | none found | Nobody answers (4 of 374) |
| Does anyone answer complaints | 100% of low-star reviews · usually same day | 83% of low-star reviews · usually same day |
| Rating in the last 90 days | 4.03 (down 0.52 on lifetime) | 3.50 (down 0.89 on lifetime) |
| Last updated | this month | Not known |
| Reads your SMS | no | no |
| Reads your contacts | yes | no |
| Shows ads | yes | no |
| Numbers confirmed on a register | none published | 4 of 5 |
| Charges we could source | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
| Charges only in the terms | not extracted yet | not extracted yet |
How to read this
Every row comes from a public source: the app store listings, the reviews people left there, and the registers kept by RBI, SEBI and IRDAI. Where a row says "Not known", we have not measured it yet, which is different from the answer being no. Qrates takes no commission from either app.
Full pages: Investing.com · IIFL